Voodoo Chili
Last modified: 23:46:45 CET on 22 Feb, 2009 |
Do you follow a specific practice routine?
At the time we recorded most of the stuff on this album I was on tour, so I was practising constantly. Since I was a kid, most of my practising centres around learning things from records - I've been doing it since I was 12 years old. My style is pretty much based on developing a vocabulary based on the way the different combinations of notes and rhythms cross with different notes [and how it] makes me feel. I learn things off records to try to gain a better understanding of why the music I'm hearing makes me feel what I feel.
I have a huge record collection, and I can pretty much put on almost any record and play along with it. It's gotten to the point where if I know a song, I know how to play it. I don't even really need to learn something, unless it's a really involved, improvised solo that goes on for 10 minutes. Or if it's something with a lot of odd time signatures - those are the kind of things that don't stay in your memory the same way as things that have more repetition. Even as a teenager, I could play all of Frank Zappa's music. But at this point, my taste has gone through so many different phases and in so many different directions - I have a pretty big repertoire of stuff I know how to play.
I love studying music, and I love the way that by learning things off other people, you can get an idea of what they were thinking, or why they chose the notes they chose, because it related in a certain way to the keyboard part or the bass part. And I love seeing the way that I don't think of a guitar part as being an entity unto itself, which I think I made the mistake of thinking all through my teenage years. Whenever I learn a guitar part, I always look at it in relationship to the bass part and the other parts that it's entwined with.
I think it has broadened my scope to look at guitar playing in relationship to the other instruments, and not just learn the guitar part, and think, yeah, that's the guitar part. It's not the guitar part unless you understand the relationship to the drums, the bass, the vocals, and the keyboards.
For a simple example, it could be one note, but it's a very different note if you're playing E on the ninth fret of the G string if C-sharp is in the bass, than it is if D is in the bass. And it's also different if it falls on the second potential 16th note of the bar than it is if it falls on the second half-note of the bar. I used to think of one note as being one note, but they're two completely different feelings and two completely difference flavours - depending on where they fall in the bar.
I know it sounds rudimentary, but I studied really complicated music as a teenager and still didn't really have that through my head - of how meaningful one note can be if it's placed in the right place, and if it's in the right harmonic climate.
I think it's probably a pretty popular misconception amongst young people.
So do you have any more advice for other guitarists?
"A lot of people seem to judge guitar playing based on how well the guitar sticks out in the music, and I don't think that's a fair way to judge it. If you listen to a Marvin Gaye, Funkadelic, John Lennon or Peter Gabriel record - where the guitar is more contributing to the musical framework - it's not "less" than guitar playing such as Jimi Hendrix's, where it's sticking out above the music. It's not less musical, it's not less beautiful, it's not less emotional. Just because something sticks out doesn't mean it's better music. There's been so many great things done with the guitar on a more subtle level, and I think a lot of the time guitar players are only interested in who's playing the fastest, who seems the coolest, who dresses the coolest, who has the longest hair, or whatever it is.
Sometimes, these faceless people - who you don't even know their name - were a part in creating really beautiful music with other people, and it's as important to develop an encyclopaedic knowledge of that type of guitar playing as much as it is to learn how to solo. When I was a teenager, I learned how to solo really fast. But there are certain really basic things about moving around in chords, or being able to play melodies that are based around chords, that I didn't get clear in my head because all I was ever concerned with was playing something that nobody else could play, or something that was really difficult to play.
I think a lot of the time, people that don't play guitar listen to it more in terms of the sound, emotion, and feeling of it - they're not concerned with how well it sticks out over the music, or what's physically happening on the instrument. To me, it just doesn't matter at all what's happening physically on the instrument. What matters is the resultant sound and the way it offsets the rhythms, melodies, and chords played on other instruments. I think it's important to not look at the guitar as a vehicle to demonstrate that you're better than the next guy, or to show that you've practiced a certain amount. It's an instrument to express yourself with, and it's an instrument for playing with other human beings.
It's also an instrument that can help you gain better insight into things that people have done in the past. I don't keep up on what guitar players are doing nowadays, but the sense I get from going to music stores is that the same sort of mental diseases are still running rampant, in terms of people saying that one guy is better than another guy. Really, nobody is any better than anybody else, in my mind. People should really look at it more in terms that it's just another tool available to make music on - one of many.
It's good to focus on learning all different types of instruments, with all different types of roles, and apply them to your knowledge of the guitar, and use them to help broaden your understanding of your instrument. It shouldn't matter if you're learning the different string parts of a Beethoven piece, a Jimi Hendrix solo, or a rhythm part to a John Lennon song. It's all just different words and languages.
When I joined the Chili Peppers, even though I was pretty advanced on the instrument itself, I hadn't developed a vocabulary of the simpler music that I liked. So when I was in a situation of the object being the ability to build music with other people, rather than show off, I didn't know what to do! I had nothing to apply to that, because most of the music I liked that was simple, I hadn't bothered to figure out because I thought it was too easy. It's important to listen to a variety of music, and to study the guitar in a variety of situations and not just when it's standing out to your mind.
What is the current status of the Red Hot Chili Peppers?
On an indefinite hiatus. No plans whatsoever to do anything - at all.
So will you tour your solo album?
I'm too involved in making music right now to tour. I spend four-and-a-half of the last 10 years on tour. In a way, I'd love to do it; it's a nice way of connecting with people. But in the case of this record, I wouldn't want to just go up on stage with my acoustic guitar like I used to. I'd want to put a couple of months into rehearsing a band, and then probably spend a couple of months on tour. Four months just seems inconceivable for me to get away from what I'm doing here. I won't say absolutely that there won't be any touring, but at this point, I can't imagine it. Recording, writing, and playing - that's really where my soul needs to be, so that's what I'm going to do.
John Meets Johnny
John's hero, Johnny Marr, plays on The Empyrean
"That was really fun, to watch him come up with ideas, because I've studied his playing so much. I had assumed his style of weaving around chords was something based on a technical understand of harmony, but it's really just based on his intuition and soul. He plays on Central and Enough Of Me. We just had one night with him. I played him a few songs in rough mix form, and then he said, I want to play on this one, I want to play on that one. Without really putting too much thought into it, he just played a ton of guitars."
Funkadelic
John explains the basis for the album-opening searing solofest, Before The Beginning
"Some friends of mine and me were hanging out on weekends, and we had a few late nights - like 5:00 in the morning - where we were laying there listening to [Funkadelic's] Maggot Brain. My friend had never heard it before, and he was making me put the CD on repeat, so he could lie there and listen to it over and over. So I woke up from a night like that, and I had just recorded After The Ending, which seemed like a real distinct type of ending for the record. I was thinking I should do something that is just as distinct of a beginning..."
When John Met Jimi
Learn the licks below to explore the stylistic similarities between our cover star and his fellow Strat-and-Marshall-toting idol, Jimi Hendrix.
John Frusciante has been influenced by a huge range of players, from punk to jazz, but it's clear that he has a particular reverence for Jimi Hendrix. There are obvious similarities between the two of them, in their use of the Fender Strat, their funky chord parts and their love of gritty fuzz sounds. More generally, though, both players have constantly experimented with gear, technique and tones, looking for new ways of using the guitar in different musical contexts. Like Hendrix, Frusciante doesn't really have a single 'signature sound' from one album to the next.
Here are two examples of the Frusciante/Hendrix link. First, the decorative chord approach, so famously used on Under The Bridge: the classic Hendrix example is Little Wing, although Curtis Mayfield was doing this even earlier. The second example is a solo to fit over the top, showeing how John combines aggression with melody.
